Essec\Faculty\Model\Contribution {#2233
  #_index: "academ_contributions"
  #_id: "15054"
  #_source: array:26 [
    "id" => "15054"
    "slug" => "cheating-and-loss-aversion-do-people-cheat-more-to-avoid-a-loss"
    "yearMonth" => "2016-12"
    "year" => "2016"
    "title" => "Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?"
    "description" => "GROLLEAU, G., KOCHER, M.G. et SUTAN, A. (2016). Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss? <i>Management Science</i>, 62(12), pp. 3428-3438."
    "authors" => array:3 [
      0 => array:3 [
        "name" => "SUTAN Angela"
        "bid" => "B00819527"
        "slug" => "sutan-angela"
      ]
      1 => array:1 [
        "name" => "Grolleau Gilles"
      ]
      2 => array:1 [
        "name" => "Kocher Martin G."
      ]
    ]
    "ouvrage" => ""
    "keywords" => []
    "updatedAt" => "2024-10-31 13:51:19"
    "publicationUrl" => "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2313"
    "publicationInfo" => array:3 [
      "pages" => "3428-3438"
      "volume" => "62"
      "number" => "12"
    ]
    "type" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Articles"
      "en" => "Journal articles"
    ]
    "support_type" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Revue scientifique"
      "en" => "Scientific journal"
    ]
    "countries" => array:2 [
      "fr" => null
      "en" => null
    ]
    "abstract" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Does the extent of cheating depend on a proper reference point? We use a real-effort matrix task that implements a two (gain versus loss frame) times two (monitored performance versus unmonitored performance) between-subjects design with 600 experimental participants to examine whether the extent of cheating is reference dependent. Self-reported performance in the unmonitored condition is significantly higher than actual performance in the monitored condition—a clear indication of cheating. However, the level of cheating is by far higher in the loss frame than in the gain frame under no monitoring. The fear of a loss seems to lead to more dishonest behavior than the lure of a gain."
      "en" => "Does the extent of cheating depend on a proper reference point? We use a real-effort matrix task that implements a two (gain versus loss frame) times two (monitored performance versus unmonitored performance) between-subjects design with 600 experimental participants to examine whether the extent of cheating is reference dependent. Self-reported performance in the unmonitored condition is significantly higher than actual performance in the monitored condition—a clear indication of cheating. However, the level of cheating is by far higher in the loss frame than in the gain frame under no monitoring. The fear of a loss seems to lead to more dishonest behavior than the lure of a gain."
    ]
    "authors_fields" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Droit "
      "en" => "Business Law"
    ]
    "indexedAt" => "2024-11-21T12:21:46.000Z"
    "docTitle" => "Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?"
    "docSurtitle" => "Articles"
    "authorNames" => "<a href="/cv/sutan-angela">SUTAN Angela</a>, Grolleau Gilles, Kocher Martin G."
    "docDescription" => "<span class="document-property-authors">SUTAN Angela, Grolleau Gilles, Kocher Martin G.</span><br><span class="document-property-authors_fields">Droit </span> | <span class="document-property-year">2016</span>"
    "keywordList" => ""
    "docPreview" => "<b>Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?</b><br><span>2016-12 | Articles </span>"
    "docType" => "research"
    "publicationLink" => "<a href="https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2313" target="_blank">Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?</a>"
  ]
  +lang: "fr"
  +"_type": "_doc"
  +"_score": 8.816764
  +"parent": null
}