Do Versus Don’t: The Impact of Framing on Goal Level Setting

Journal articles

Do Versus Don’t: The Impact of Framing on Goal Level Setting

Year

2021

Authors

PROKOPEC Sonja, TUK Mirjam A, VAN DEN BERGH Bram

Abstract

The consumer behavior literature extensively studied the impact of goal setting on behavior and performance. However, much less is known about the antecedents of goal level setting – consumers’ decision of whether to work out twice or three times per week. Consumers can decide how many goal-consistent activities to undertake (‘goal-consistent decision frame’; such as exercising two days per week) or to forego (‘goal-inconsistent decision frame’; such as not exercising five days per week). While objectively the same decision, we argue that these different frames impact consumers’ ambition. Making a decision to forego goal-consistent activities triggers negative, self-evaluative emotions and to compensate for these unfavorable self-evaluations, consumers set more ambitious goal levels.

TUK, M.A., PROKOPEC, S. et VAN DEN BERGH, B. (2021). Do Versus Don’t: The Impact of Framing on Goal Level Setting. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), pp. 1003-1024.

Keywords

goal setting, goal level, ambition, framing, self-discrepancy, motivation