Essec\Faculty\Model\Contribution {#2216 ▼
#_index: "academ_contributions"
#_id: "15032"
#_source: array:26 [
"id" => "15032"
"slug" => "15032-economic-nationalism-and-the-home-court-advantage"
"yearMonth" => "2025-01"
"year" => "2025"
"title" => "Economic nationalism and the home court advantage"
"description" => "CHOUDHURY, A., JANDHYALA, S. et NANDKUMAR, A. (2025). Economic nationalism and the home court advantage. <i>Strategic Management Journal</i>, 46(1), pp. 242-272. 
CHOUDHURY, A., JANDHYALA, S. et NANDKUMAR, A. (2025). Economic nationalism and the home court advant "
"authors" => array:3 [
0 => array:3 [
"name" => "JANDHYALA Srividya"
"bid" => "B00536876"
"slug" => "jandhyala-srividya"
]
1 => array:1 [
"name" => "CHOUDHURY Arnab"
]
2 => array:1 [
"name" => "NANDKUMAR Anand"
]
]
"ouvrage" => ""
"keywords" => array:5 [
0 => "intellectual property"
1 => "multinational corporations"
2 => "nationalism"
3 => "nonmarket strategy"
4 => "patent disputes"
]
"updatedAt" => "2025-03-26 10:49:42"
"publicationUrl" => "http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3658"
"publicationInfo" => array:3 [
"pages" => "242-272"
"volume" => "46"
"number" => "1"
]
"type" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Articles"
"en" => "Journal articles"
]
"support_type" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Revue scientifique"
"en" => "Scientific journal"
]
"countries" => array:2 [
"fr" => null
"en" => null
]
"abstract" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Political and regulatory actors routinely adopt or enforce policies to protect domestic firms at the expense of foreign firms. However, since courts are expected to be neutral and act independently, a question arises whether (and why) they discriminate against foreign firms. We argue that the courts are nationalistic, which emanates from judges differentiating between in-group (domestic) and out-group (foreign) members. In a sample of 58,754 patent disputes adjudicated by US federal district courts between 1983 and 2016, we find domestic patent holders and challengers are more successful than their foreign counterparts. Rulings involving foreign firms are more likely to exhibit nationalistic rhetoric. Judicial ideology moderates the differential odds of success between domestic and foreign firms. Thus, the legal system is another source of economic nationalism. Political and regulatory actors routinely adopt or enforce policies to protect domestic firms at the "
"en" => "Political and regulatory actors routinely adopt or enforce policies to protect domestic firms at the expense of foreign firms. However, since courts are expected to be neutral and act independently, a question arises whether (and why) they discriminate against foreign firms. We argue that the courts are nationalistic, which emanates from judges differentiating between in-group (domestic) and out-group (foreign) members. In a sample of 58,754 patent disputes adjudicated by US federal district courts between 1983 and 2016, we find domestic patent holders and challengers are more successful than their foreign counterparts. Rulings involving foreign firms are more likely to exhibit nationalistic rhetoric. Judicial ideology moderates the differential odds of success between domestic and foreign firms. Thus, the legal system is another source of economic nationalism. Political and regulatory actors routinely adopt or enforce policies to protect domestic firms at the "
]
"authors_fields" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Management"
"en" => "Management"
]
"indexedAt" => "2025-03-31T10:21:45.000Z"
"docTitle" => "Economic nationalism and the home court advantage"
"docSurtitle" => "Journal articles"
"authorNames" => "<a href="/cv/jandhyala-srividya">JANDHYALA Srividya</a>, CHOUDHURY Arnab, NANDKUMAR Anand"
"docDescription" => "<span class="document-property-authors">JANDHYALA Srividya, CHOUDHURY Arnab, NANDKUMAR Anand</span><br><span class="document-property-authors_fields">Management</span> | <span class="document-property-year">2025</span> <span class="document-property-authors">JANDHYALA Srividya, CHOUDHURY Arnab, NANDKUMAR Anand</span>< "
"keywordList" => "<a href="#">intellectual property</a>, <a href="#">multinational corporations</a>, <a href="#">nationalism</a>, <a href="#">nonmarket strategy</a>, <a href="#">patent disputes</a> <a href="#">intellectual property</a>, <a href="#">multinational corporations</a>, <a href="#">natio "
"docPreview" => "<b>Economic nationalism and the home court advantage</b><br><span>2025-01 | Journal articles </span>"
"docType" => "research"
"publicationLink" => "<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3658" target="_blank">Economic nationalism and the home court advantage</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3658" target="_blank">Economic nationalism and the home court ad "
]
+lang: "en"
+"_type": "_doc"
+"_score": 8.679924
+"parent": null
}
