Information Systems Action Research: Debunking Myths and Overcoming Barriers
The relevance of action research as a research method in the information systems (IS) discipline is not disputed. Nevertheless, the extent to which action research is published in good journals is infrequent enough to indicate a serious problem. In this article, we explore the reasons underlying this situation and make recommendations aiming to increase both the practice and the publication of action research. To identify both the barriers to undertaking action research and potential ways of overcoming those barriers, we survey 218 authors of 120 articles demonstrating empirical action research published in 12 of our good journals during the period 1982–2016. We received 70 usable responses. We also surveyed 52 editors of selected IS journals and received 25 usable responses. Our findings are revealing as they indicate both genuine barriers associated with action research and some apparent barriers that are in reality misperceptions or myths. In reflecting on these, we emphasize the special qualities of action research. We also reflect on the critical role that action research plays in the IS field as a whole and its potential for further contributions to research and practice, given the strong and close connections with organizational problem contexts that action research requires. Finally, we make a number of recommendations that are designed to increase the incidence of action research in the IS discipline Lien vers l'article
AVISON, D., DAVISON, R.M. and MALAURENT, J. (2018). Information Systems Action Research: Debunking Myths and Overcoming Barriers. Information and Management, 55(2), pp. 177-187.
Mots clés : #Action-research, #Engaged-research, #Publishing, #Journals, #Doctoral-studies, #Rigor, #Relevance