Essec\Faculty\Model\Contribution {#2233 ▼
#_index: "academ_contributions"
#_id: "1021"
#_source: array:26 [
"id" => "1021"
"slug" => "1021-does-the-crowdfunding-platform-matter-risks-of-negative-attitudes-in-two-sided-markets"
"yearMonth" => "2017-10"
"year" => "2017"
"title" => "Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes in Two-Sided Markets"
"description" => "LACAN, C. et DESMET, P. (2017). Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes in Two-Sided Markets. <i>Journal of Consumer Marketing</i>, 34(6), pp. 472-479. 
LACAN, C. et DESMET, P. (2017). Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes i "
"authors" => array:2 [
0 => array:3 [
"name" => "DESMET Pierre"
"bid" => "B00000155"
"slug" => "desmet-pierre"
]
1 => array:1 [
"name" => "LACAN C."
]
]
"ouvrage" => ""
"keywords" => array:5 [
0 => "Platform"
1 => "Word-of-mouth"
2 => "Crowdfunding"
3 => "Sharing economy"
4 => "Two-sided market"
]
"updatedAt" => "2023-01-28 01:00:12"
"publicationUrl" => "https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2126/full/html"
"publicationInfo" => array:3 [
"pages" => "472-479"
"volume" => "34"
"number" => "6"
]
"type" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Articles"
"en" => "Journal articles"
]
"support_type" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Revue scientifique"
"en" => "Scientific journal"
]
"countries" => array:2 [
"fr" => null
"en" => null
]
"abstract" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Le financement participatif (crowdfunding) est de plus en plus utilisé pour collecter des fonds auprès d'un grand nombre de contributeurs. Au delà du projet par lui-même et de son porteur, le choix des contributeurs est aussi influencé par la plate-forme Internet qui présente le projet et qui joue ainsi un rôle d'intermédiaire. Une étude en ligne montre que la plateforme influence non seulement la décision de participer au financement mais aussi la décision d'émettre du bouche-à-oreille pour faire connaître la campagne. Le financement participatif (crowdfunding) est de plus en plus utilisé pour collecter des fonds aupr "
"en" => """
Purpose—Crowdfunding has become a prominent means to raise donations online from a large number of contributors, such that open calls for contributions inherently involve another actor, namely, the Internet platform which is creating a two-sided market. This article examines the effect of this intermediary on contributors’ willingness to participate in crowdfunding projects. \n Purpose—Crowdfunding has become a prominent means to raise donations online from a large number of c
Design/methodology/approach—In an online survey the relative effect of contributors’ attitudes toward the crowdfunding platform on two key behaviours is measured: willingness to share word-of-mouth and willingness to participate in a project. \n Design/methodology/approach—In an online survey the relative effect of contributors’ attitudes towar
Findings—In the theoretical framework of a two-sided market, the empirical study reveals that attitude toward a crowdfunding platform moderates contributors’ willingness to participate. This effect can be explained by several risk factors that affect the platform’s perceived usefulness and ease of use. These factors have a negative influence on attitude toward the platform, which in turn reduce support for the project. The effects are stronger for willingness to participate than for word-of-mouth intentions. Research limitations/implications—Declarative measures and a focus on utilitarian dimensions of contributor participation limit the external validity of the findings. \n Findings—In the theoretical framework of a two-sided market, the empirical study reveals that attitu
Practical implications—Using the results of this study, Internet platforms can improve attitudes among potential contributors. Project creators can also use the findings to adapt their communication campaigns and reduce inhibitions that keep contributors from using the platform. \n Practical implications—Using the results of this study, Internet platforms can improve attitudes amo
Originality/value—This study advances marketing and crowdfunding literature by highlighting the potential dark side of a platform that functions as an intermediary in a twosided market. Originality/value—This study advances marketing and crowdfunding literature by highlighting the pote
"""
]
"authors_fields" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Marketing"
"en" => "Marketing"
]
"indexedAt" => "2025-03-14T20:21:40.000Z"
"docTitle" => "Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes in Two-Sided Markets"
"docSurtitle" => "Articles"
"authorNames" => "<a href="/cv/desmet-pierre">DESMET Pierre</a>, LACAN C."
"docDescription" => "<span class="document-property-authors">DESMET Pierre, LACAN C.</span><br><span class="document-property-authors_fields">Marketing</span> | <span class="document-property-year">2017</span> <span class="document-property-authors">DESMET Pierre, LACAN C.</span><br><span class="document-prop "
"keywordList" => "<a href="#">Platform</a>, <a href="#">Word-of-mouth</a>, <a href="#">Crowdfunding</a>, <a href="#">Sharing economy</a>, <a href="#">Two-sided market</a> <a href="#">Platform</a>, <a href="#">Word-of-mouth</a>, <a href="#">Crowdfunding</a>, <a href="#">S "
"docPreview" => "<b>Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes in Two-Sided Markets</b><br><span>2017-10 | Articles </span> <b>Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes in Two-Sided Markets</b><br><s "
"docType" => "research"
"publicationLink" => "<a href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2126/full/html" target="_blank">Does the Crowdfunding Platform Matter? Risks of Negative Attitudes in Two-Sided Markets</a> <a href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2126/full/html" target="_bl "
]
+lang: "fr"
+"_type": "_doc"
+"_score": 9.230796
+"parent": null
}
