Essec\Faculty\Model\Contribution {#2190
#_index: "academ_contributions"
#_id: "2885"
#_source: array:26 [
"id" => "2885"
"slug" => "when-it-depends-amounts-to-more-than-simple-contingent-relationships-three-canonical-forms-of-inversions"
"yearMonth" => "2016-08"
"year" => "2016"
"title" => "When "It Depends" Amounts to More Than Simple Contingent Relationships: Three Canonical Forms of Inversions"
"description" => "CAVARRETTA, F., TRINCHERA, F., CHOI, D.O. et HANNAH, S.T. (2016). When "It Depends" Amounts to More Than Simple Contingent Relationships: Three Canonical Forms of Inversions. <i>Journal of Organizational Behavior</i>, 37(6), pp. 933-945."
"authors" => array:4 [
0 => array:3 [
"name" => "CAVARRETTA Fabrice"
"bid" => "B00119673"
"slug" => "cavarretta-fabrice"
]
1 => array:1 [
"name" => "TRINCHERA F."
]
2 => array:1 [
"name" => "CHOI D. O."
]
3 => array:1 [
"name" => "HANNAH S. T."
]
]
"ouvrage" => ""
"keywords" => array:6 [
0 => "Curvilinéraité"
1 => "Désordinal"
2 => "Interaction"
3 => "Inversion"
4 => "Moderation"
5 => "Ordinal"
]
"updatedAt" => "2022-03-04 16:40:33"
"publicationUrl" => "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2093"
"publicationInfo" => array:3 [
"pages" => "933-945"
"volume" => "37"
"number" => "6"
]
"type" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Articles"
"en" => "Journal articles"
]
"support_type" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Revue scientifique"
"en" => "Scientific journal"
]
"countries" => array:2 [
"fr" => null
"en" => null
]
"abstract" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Les théories sur le comportement organisationnel sont sujettes à de potentielles inversions concernant la nature de l’effet attendu ou décrit (c.à.d. l’effet passe de positif à négatif ou vice versa). Néanmoins, ces inversions sont rarement prises en compte. Nous explorons trois types d’inversion canoniques : le maximum ou minimum dans un modèle de régression quadratique, le point d’intersection dans une interaction désordinale, et le changement de pente dans un modèle de régression avec modérateur. Nous décrivons les motivations et l’importance théorique et empirique de prendre en compte de telles inversions dans la construction et la validation des théories. Nous explicitons des situations où de telles inversions sont interprétées empiriquement de manière erronée et présentons des approches pour rechercher de potentielles inversions. Deux cas d’erreurs peuvent apparaître. Le premier concerne l’omission, quand l’inversion a lieu mais n’est pas observé dans l’échantillon. Le second cas, les chercheurs supposent à tort qu’une inversion a lieu alors que celle-ci n’existe qu’en dehors de l’étendue des variables. Nous illustrons différent types d’inversion par des exemples simulés. Cette étude devrait encourager et équiper les chercheurs en gestion à identifier les limites à leurs théories posées par les inversions."
"en" => "Organizational behavior theories can be subject to potential inversions in the nature of the effects expected or described (i.e., an effect inverts from positive to negative or vice versa). Yet, inversions are rarely considered or assessed. We explore three possible canonical inversions: the maximum or minimum point in a quadratic regression model, the point of intersection in disordinal interactions, and the change of slope in a moderated regression model. We describe both the motivation for, and the theoretical and empirical importance of, considering such inversions in theory-building and testing. We consider common situations in which inversions are misinterpreted empirically and present methods to conduct explorations for potential inversions. Two different cases of errors concerning inversions can occur. In the first case entailing omission, an inversion is occurring but is not observed in the sample. In the second case, researchers wrongly assume an inversion is occurring in their model, yet the prospective inversion would actually occur out of the range of possible values on the focal variable(s), and is thus not significant. We illustrate different types of inversions using simulated examples. Ultimately, we seek to encourage and equip management researchers to identify important theoretical boundary conditions imposed by inversions."
]
"authors_fields" => array:2 [
"fr" => "Management"
"en" => "Management"
]
"indexedAt" => "2024-04-20T11:21:45.000Z"
"docTitle" => "When "It Depends" Amounts to More Than Simple Contingent Relationships: Three Canonical Forms of Inversions"
"docSurtitle" => "Journal articles"
"authorNames" => "<a href="/cv/cavarretta-fabrice">CAVARRETTA Fabrice</a>, TRINCHERA F., CHOI D. O., HANNAH S. T."
"docDescription" => "<span class="document-property-authors">CAVARRETTA Fabrice, TRINCHERA F., CHOI D. O., HANNAH S. T.</span><br><span class="document-property-authors_fields">Management</span> | <span class="document-property-year">2016</span>"
"keywordList" => "<a href="#">Curvilinéraité</a>, <a href="#">Désordinal</a>, <a href="#">Interaction</a>, <a href="#">Inversion</a>, <a href="#">Moderation</a>, <a href="#">Ordinal</a>"
"docPreview" => "<b>When "It Depends" Amounts to More Than Simple Contingent Relationships: Three Canonical Forms of Inversions</b><br><span>2016-08 | Journal articles </span>"
"docType" => "research"
"publicationLink" => "<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2093" target="_blank">When "It Depends" Amounts to More Than Simple Contingent Relationships: Three Canonical Forms of Inversions</a>"
]
+lang: "en"
+"_type": "_doc"
+"_score": 9.002414
+"parent": null
}
