Essec\Faculty\Model\Contribution {#2190
  #_index: "academ_contributions"
  #_id: "11945"
  #_source: array:26 [
    "id" => "11945"
    "slug" => "the-missing-link-communities-of-practice-as-bridges-between-institutional-entrepreneurs-and-frontline-practitioners-in-institutionalizing-a-divergent-practice"
    "yearMonth" => "2021-01"
    "year" => "2021"
    "title" => "The Missing Link: Communities of Practice as Bridges Between Institutional Entrepreneurs and Frontline Practitioners in Institutionalizing a Divergent Practice"
    "description" => "GAUTIER, A., PACHE, A.C., CHOWDHURY, I. et LIGONIE, M. (2021). The Missing Link: Communities of Practice as Bridges Between Institutional Entrepreneurs and Frontline Practitioners in Institutionalizing a Divergent Practice. <i>Research in the Sociology of Organizations</i>, 71, pp. 199-230."
    "authors" => array:4 [
      0 => array:3 [
        "name" => "GAUTIER Arthur"
        "bid" => "B00341350"
        "slug" => "gautier-arthur"
      ]
      1 => array:3 [
        "name" => "PACHE Anne-Claire"
        "bid" => "B00010680"
        "slug" => "pache-anne-claire"
      ]
      2 => array:1 [
        "name" => "CHOWDHURY Imran"
      ]
      3 => array:1 [
        "name" => "LIGONIE Marion"
      ]
    ]
    "ouvrage" => ""
    "keywords" => array:1 [
      0 => "Community of practice, corporate philanthropy, frontline practitioners, institutional change, institutional  entrepreneurship,  legitimacy"
    ]
    "updatedAt" => "2021-09-24 10:33:27"
    "publicationUrl" => "https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000071008/full/html"
    "publicationInfo" => array:3 [
      "pages" => "199-230"
      "volume" => "71"
      "number" => null
    ]
    "type" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Articles"
      "en" => "Journal articles"
    ]
    "support_type" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Revue scientifique"
      "en" => "Scientific journal"
    ]
    "countries" => array:2 [
      "fr" => null
      "en" => null
    ]
    "abstract" => array:2 [
      "fr" => """
        This chapter seeks to understand how new practices that challenge established\n
        norms and values become institutionalized by studying the development of\n
        corporate philanthropy in France over three decades (1979–2011). Our\n
        inductive qualitative study uncovers the processes that enable actors at both\n
        field- and organizational-levels to enhance a new practice’s internal and external legitimacy, ultimately leading to its institutionalization. In particular, we\n
        identify the central role of a community of practice as a bridge between the\n
        field-level, purposive interventions (theorizing, influencing policy) of an institutional entrepreneur and the organizational-level, emergent interventions (mobilizing, embedding) of frontline practitioners experimenting with the new\n
        divergent practice, thereby enabling its legitimation and, ultimately, its institutionalization. As such, our findings contribute to refining our understanding\n
        of institutionalization processes as inherently distributed and to uncovering\n
        communities of practice as the missing link between “heroic” entrepreneurs’\n
        interventions and the hidden work of frontline practitioners implementing the \n
        new practice.
        """
      "en" => """
        This chapter seeks to understand how new practices that challenge established\n
        norms and values become institutionalized by studying the development of\n
        corporate philanthropy in France over three decades (1979–2011). Our\n
        inductive qualitative study uncovers the processes that enable actors at both\n
        field- and organizational-levels to enhance a new practice’s internal and external legitimacy, ultimately leading to its institutionalization. In particular, we\n
        identify the central role of a community of practice as a bridge between the\n
        field-level, purposive interventions (theorizing, influencing policy) of an institutional entrepreneur and the organizational-level, emergent interventions (mobilizing, embedding) of frontline practitioners experimenting with the new\n
        divergent practice, thereby enabling its legitimation and, ultimately, its institutionalization. As such, our findings contribute to refining our understanding\n
        of institutionalization processes as inherently distributed and to uncovering\n
        communities of practice as the missing link between “heroic” entrepreneurs’\n
        interventions and the hidden work of frontline practitioners implementing the \n
        new practice.
        """
    ]
    "authors_fields" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Management"
      "en" => "Management"
    ]
    "indexedAt" => "2024-04-18T07:22:03.000Z"
    "docTitle" => "The Missing Link: Communities of Practice as Bridges Between Institutional Entrepreneurs and Frontline Practitioners in Institutionalizing a Divergent Practice"
    "docSurtitle" => "Journal articles"
    "authorNames" => "<a href="/cv/gautier-arthur">GAUTIER Arthur</a>, <a href="/cv/pache-anne-claire">PACHE Anne-Claire</a>, CHOWDHURY Imran, LIGONIE Marion"
    "docDescription" => "<span class="document-property-authors">GAUTIER Arthur, PACHE Anne-Claire, CHOWDHURY Imran, LIGONIE Marion</span><br><span class="document-property-authors_fields">Management</span> | <span class="document-property-year">2021</span>"
    "keywordList" => "<a href="#">Community of practice, corporate philanthropy, frontline practitioners, institutional change, institutional  entrepreneurship,  legitimacy</a>"
    "docPreview" => "<b>The Missing Link: Communities of Practice as Bridges Between Institutional Entrepreneurs and Frontline Practitioners in Institutionalizing a Divergent Practice</b><br><span>2021-01 | Journal articles </span>"
    "docType" => "research"
    "publicationLink" => "<a href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000071008/full/html" target="_blank">The Missing Link: Communities of Practice as Bridges Between Institutional Entrepreneurs and Frontline Practitioners in Institutionalizing a Divergent Practice</a>"
  ]
  +lang: "en"
  +"_type": "_doc"
  +"_score": 8.730561
  +"parent": null
}