Essec\Faculty\Model\Contribution {#2186
  #_index: "academ_contributions"
  #_id: "4151"
  #_source: array:26 [
    "id" => "4151"
    "slug" => "revisiting-the-classic-tension-between-hierarchy-and-freedom"
    "yearMonth" => "2013-07"
    "year" => "2013"
    "title" => "Revisiting the Classic Tension Between Hierarchy and Freedom"
    "description" => "BIBARD, L. (2013). Revisiting the Classic Tension Between Hierarchy and Freedom. Dans: <i>Uncertainty, Diversity and the Common Good</i>. 1st ed. Gower, pp. 141-153."
    "authors" => array:1 [
      0 => array:3 [
        "name" => "BIBARD Laurent"
        "bid" => "B00000041"
        "slug" => "bibard-laurent"
      ]
    ]
    "ouvrage" => "Uncertainty, Diversity and the Common Good"
    "keywords" => array:5 [
      0 => "Bien commun"
      1 => "Education"
      2 => "Genres"
      3 => "Leadership"
      4 => "Politique"
    ]
    "updatedAt" => "2021-09-06 14:06:32"
    "publicationUrl" => null
    "publicationInfo" => array:3 [
      "pages" => "141-153"
      "volume" => null
      "number" => null
    ]
    "type" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Chapitres"
      "en" => "Book chapters"
    ]
    "support_type" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Editeur"
      "en" => "Publisher"
    ]
    "countries" => array:2 [
      "fr" => null
      "en" => null
    ]
    "abstract" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "La différence entre intérêt privé et bien commun revient, pour la philosophie politique classique, à la différence entre tyrannie et bon gouvernement (Xénophon, Hiéron ; cf Platon, République). Les notions de pouvoir, de tyrannie, et d’intérêt privé s’opposent aux notions de leadership, de bon gouvernement, et de bien commun. La science politique moderne, qui est la base sur laquelle est construite l’économie moderne, accorde de son côté une légitimité fondamentale à l’intérêt privé des individus. La compréhension renouvelée des enjeux d’un réel leadership demande de comprendre à nouveaux frais la tension entre philosophie politique classique et science politique moderne. Cela passe à son tour par une compréhension renouvelée des rôles respectifs du féminin et du masculin dans l’éducation."
      "en" => "Ancient political philosophy teaches the difference between tyranny and leadership as being a difference between aiming, either at a private, or at a common good (Xenophon, Hiero; cf Plato, Republic). Power, tyranny and private good are contrasted with leadership, real governance and public good. Modern political science, which is the basis on which economics are nowadays understood, is grounded on a specific attention paid to the legitimacy of individual – e.g. private – interest here and now. A relevant understanding of leadership issues related to the rebirth of the notion of common good requires revisiting the tension between ancient political philosophy and modern political science. This renewal must revisit the understanding of male and female leadership roles in education."
    ]
    "authors_fields" => array:2 [
      "fr" => "Management"
      "en" => "Management"
    ]
    "indexedAt" => "2024-04-23T05:21:58.000Z"
    "docTitle" => "Revisiting the Classic Tension Between Hierarchy and Freedom"
    "docSurtitle" => "Book chapters"
    "authorNames" => "<a href="/cv/bibard-laurent">BIBARD Laurent</a>"
    "docDescription" => "<span class="document-property-authors">BIBARD Laurent</span><br><span class="document-property-authors_fields">Management</span> | <span class="document-property-year">2013</span>"
    "keywordList" => "<a href="#">Bien commun</a>, <a href="#">Education</a>, <a href="#">Genres</a>, <a href="#">Leadership</a>, <a href="#">Politique</a>"
    "docPreview" => "<b>Revisiting the Classic Tension Between Hierarchy and Freedom</b><br><span>2013-07 | Book chapters </span>"
    "docType" => "research"
    "publicationLink" => "<a href="#" target="_blank">Revisiting the Classic Tension Between Hierarchy and Freedom</a>"
  ]
  +lang: "en"
  +"_type": "_doc"
  +"_score": 9.174575
  +"parent": null
}